Quo Vadis

Came in here for lunch. I am a regular at Fino - a sister restaurant - so I wanted to see what they were doing. in a nutshell it is a calmer verson of J. Sheekey/Ivy - below fine dining, but above a bistro. Nothing is bad here - it is just good quality (the set menu is good value indeed). Nice place to spend a lazy afternoon hiding from work.
Comment on this reader review

- View all reviews by this user
9 Overall rating
Food 8 | Service 9 | Atmosphere 8 | Value for money 10
Monday, March 29, 2010

Things were looking good when my party of six were shown their way to 'the Snug', a small room to the side of the main dining room. It was quiet and cozy. The menu was impressive. Starters were absolutely fine but when the main course came, we all had to wait 10-15 minutes for the vegetables (having been told that they would be 'one minute late'). I asked for the Head Waiter but he never appeared. Our wine remained sitting in the ice and I had no access to it because I was too snug against the wall. I did finally squeeze out and see the Head Waiter who said he was not going to charge me for the vegetable side dishes. I said that it would have been nice for somebody to have told us that at the table. When the bill came, I really thought that the small reduction by not being charged for the side dishes did not compensate for the (slight) stress of not knowing when to start eating the rapidly cooling main dishes - at the only time of the week when one was not meant to be stressed! I eventually told them what I thought was appropriate to pay, and said that although the food was excellent, I would not be back and would not say brilliant things to others about the place. Great shame!
Comment on this reader review

Hugh Jones
6 Overall rating
Food 8 | Service 2 | Atmosphere 8 | Value for money 5
Sunday, February 28, 2010

Failing to get in anytwhere on Valentines day my wife and I settled on this place as a Monday night post Valentines treat.

Noting the reviews on this site I avoided the lamb brains but really only because my wife was a little squeemish about the whole offal thing and we settled for the steak for two option with treble cooked chips and spinach; what a delight. Plumping for a rare steak, as advised, the meat melted in the mouth and the chips, whilst not quite as plentyful as one hoped were quite unique - a bit of an odd colour though.

The wine list was short enough to allow a choice from wines we had heard of but long enough to maintain the feeling that there was a choice. Because of the evening we toook the easy option and plumped for a mid range Champagne which I am sure tasted all the better that night because of where we were and why we were there but at the end of the day who cares why it was great?

The tables were a little close on the down side and one did feel as if one was sitting in a corridor at times as the waiting staff attended frequently to all the customers sitting further away from our table.

Not cheap but so what, it was a great experience.
Comment on this reader review

James Brookes
7 Overall rating
Food 8 | Service 8 | Atmosphere 7 | Value for money 6
Tuesday, February 16, 2010

My wife was slightly reluctant to return, but the half price food deal was too good to miss and our second visited totally vindicated the restaurant in her eyes. "Fish and chips" - a large chunk of ultra-fresh halibut to be precise - did the trick and a dessert to die for completed the transformation.

An excellent sirloin steak and belly of pork with exemplary crackling comprised our other main courses and a NZ red wine from the "specials" was top notch and towards the lower end of the price range.

A not especially welcoming receptionist and staff chatting together in the bar were minus points (the restaurant was very quiet on a Sunday night), but service itself was fine. The first bill showed full prices without a discount, but this was immediately remedied.

I can't afford this kind of dining on a regular basis (nearly £200 for three at menu prices) but the discount brought a high quality experience within reach. Keep them coming!
Comment on this reader review

Kentishwanderer
8 Overall rating
Food 9 | Service 8 | Atmosphere 7 | Value for money 7
Monday, February 01, 2010

Quite disappointed with dinner on Friday night - and this covers both the quality of the food and the service. I started with calves brain which was fine but was quite simply a brain, rolled in breadcrumbs, deep fried and then plopped on a plate with a dollop of salsa and tartare sauce. The presentation was questionable - thumb and finger prints peppered the side of the plate.

My other half had ham hock terrine which was overly salty and was also poorly presented thanks to a giant chuck of bread which they'd thrown over the top of the dish.

For mains I had the partridge which was dry and sticky and my girlfriend had the monkfish confit which had been so drowned in butter, the beetroot had lost most of its earthy taste.

We ordered potato sticks and sprout tops to accompany - the former were indistinguishable from a 1980s packet of Smith's Chipsticks (albeit served in a silver pot), the latter had met the same fate as the monkfish.

Right, you're thinking, but surely the service made up for it? It did to an extent; the lady who took our coats and showed us to our table was delightful. But then we were assigned a waiter who seemed to exude the same confidence and lack of interest as a post-pubescent school child. We had to ask the guy twice for our wine and it still didn't arrive. In the end we asked another waiter who responded immediately.

When we were presented with the bill we noticed we'd been charged a small amount of money for a thing called 'StreetSmart'. Was this a charge for our coats? No, the waiter explained, it was a donation to a charity to help the homeless.

Charity? Hang on, I said, I don't remember you telling us about this BEFORE putting this charge on the bill. 'Oh,' he said, 'we normally have a small card we put on your table but we've run out of them.'

It's very noble indeed of Quo Vadis to support a homeless charity. Like spoof DJs Smashy and Nicey, it seems they don't really like to talk about it - I've searched their website and there's not a single reference to their charity work. We left the charge on - it was 88p - but surely it would have been a matter of principled courtesy to check with the customer first?

Given the amount of money swilling about in that place I think it would have been a better idea if the waiter had told us that Quo Vadis supports a local charity helping the homeless; 'with your permission we'd like to put a small charge on your bill, though we'd be very grateful if you would like to donate more'. If they'd done that we'd have definitely given more - and would have left feeling slightly less guilty about having chucked more than £120 at dinner. Instead we left feeling like they'd rifled through our coats during the meal.

Whither goest thou (Quo Vadis)? Home ... never to darken the door of 26-29 Dean Street again.
View/Add comments (4)

Simon Horsborough
5 Overall rating
Food 5 | Service 2 | Atmosphere 6 | Value for money 5
Sunday, December 06, 2009

Popped in for a post theatre meal on the off chance and we were accomodated superbly event though we were late and had no booking. busy dining room that has real atmosphere and the staff extremely hospitable. had a steak tartare and lobster spaghetti which were flavoursome and comforting, great wine list and one of the most stylish and comfortable dining rooms in london. in short thought it was brilliant.
Comment on this reader review

The Shrimp - View all reviews by this user
9 Overall rating
Food 8 | Service 9 | Atmosphere 10 | Value for money 9
Sunday, November 15, 2009

Very pleasant experience last saturday evening,grown up service,excellent food and good atmosphere.Notable dishes were the Calfs brains,Veal Cutlet and Rib for two-puddings were possibly the weak link but may have been down to bad choice after rich main courses/starters.A good value bottle of Urbina “Reserva Especial” topped off an excellent meal.Well worth a visit if it stays this consistent.
Comment on this reader review

mal - View all reviews by this user
8 Overall rating
Food 8 | Service 9 | Atmosphere 8 | Value for money 7
Monday, November 09, 2009

My partner & I took advantage of the set lunch earlier today after reading great reviews. Seated among the `expense account` customers and a sprinkling of luvvies we quickly realised that to get a decent meal in this establishment we would have to pay considerably more than the £17.50 for 2 courses plus service charge and an attempt to divest us of £2 p.p for some bread and butter. Now, this is not a vast sum BUT the food simply wasn`t worth it. Tasteless starters and quite poor main courses were offered but no enquiry made as to why they weren`t finished. We do take advantage of special offers made at some of London's finest restaurants and most are superb and those are the ones we revisit at other times. I`m afraid that the phrase `emperor`s new clothes` is the one that comes to my mind here. Still, it was a good excuse to conplete our dining experience at Chez Bertaux with a coffee and a magnificient pastry!
Comment on this reader review

marilyn terchin - View all reviews by this user
2 Overall rating
Food 2 | Service 2 | Atmosphere 2 | Value for money 1
Wednesday, October 14, 2009

I'm not sure why Quo Vadis is so highly rated by others as I thought it was distinctly so so after a recent lunchtime visit. The room is pleasant and buzzy with the Soho business crowd and to my recollection the décor isn’t much changed from its previous incarnation.

Starters were ham hock terrine and whitebait which my host enjoyed although there isn’t an awful lot of cooking involved with this dish. The terrine was chunky but lacked flavour and would have been better accompanied by homemade chutney. We both then had rump steaks. These were poorly butchered and cut far too thin, so they covered much of the plate but were overcooked as medium to well done rather than the requested medium rare. It was probably impossible to cook them anything but medium or beyond. The flavour was good and the béarnaise was all it should be. Chips can no longer be simply cooked but have to be at least tripled cooked. As a diner I do not care that a chip is tripled cooked as long as it is good and these certainly were excellent and so they should be at £4.50.

At over £60, without any alcohol, the food was no more than average and represents poor value for money.
Comment on this reader review

6 Overall rating
Food 5 | Service 7 | Atmosphere 7 | Value for money 4
Wednesday, September 09, 2009

Early supper last night so restaurant was pretty quiet and lacking that bit of buzz. Most important though, the food was very good and served efficiently by pleasant waiting staff.

Only shortcomings were lack of acknowledgement of major allergies flagged up in our on-line booking. Top restaurants should take these things seriously. Also tables are v close together (a general problem in London restaurants). Prices towards the top end of what you'd expect from the best of the London eateries.

Overall though, a very nice experience and one I'd be happy to repeat.
Comment on this reader review

Mark
7 Overall rating
Food 8 | Service 7 | Atmosphere 7 | Value for money 6
Tuesday, August 18, 2009