Murano

20-22 Queen Street, Mayfair, London, W1J 5PR - View on a map
Telephone: 020 7495 1127

Murano Restaurant In London
Details Image
Overall 7.3
Food 8.0
Service 8.0
Atmosphere 7.0
Value 6.0
Based on 1 reviews

what the critics say

Metro

Marina O'Loughlin - 3/5

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 - I have a lot of time for Hartnett. She comes across like a genuine sort of gal, one who works bloody hard and has won major plaudits in what's still very much a man's world. And I like most of what we eat at Murano. In the case of some pheasant agnolotti, I positively adore it: perfect pasta hand-formed into belly button-shaped pouches stuffed with gamey bird; sultry, silky white onion purée; and a generous dandruff of pungently sexy Alba truffle. So why do I leave feeling so deflated?

Telegraph

Zoe Williams

Thursday, November 13, 2008 - Hartnett has been put in charge of his new restaurant, Murano, which opened in August, and is a very pleasing space – it's classy, there's grey leather on the walls and you get told off if you play with the dangling crystal objets, though there isn't acres of space between tables.

+ Show more critic reviews

your comments review this restaurant and win a bottle of champagne

i was reccomended Murano by a friend of mine from Biddulph (STOKEonTRENT) and i was very impressed by the quality and service.The food was so good that i got home and next day i tried to copy it but was a failiure,Why no chef like ANGELA open a restaurant in this area instead they all go in the big city.There is some opportunity near CONGLETON/MACCLESFIELD to give us diners the pleasure of enjoyng such lovely experience.
Comment on this reader review

JAQUELINE STANIER
Overall rating 7 stars
Food 8 | Service 8 | Atmosphere 7 | Value for money 6
Saturday, June 09, 2012

True to my word, and of course purely in the pursuit of scientific enquiry, we sneaked in again for Friday lunch six months after our first visit (actually we had to book a good month in advance), and, nope, couldn’t detect any significant change. Broadly miraculous food, a perfect level of friendly, courteous service with no hint of subservience, obsequiousness or over-attentiveness, and once again an experience to lighten the step and elevate the spirit.

Angela was again in the kitchen. On this occasion and unnoticed by the couple she was serving (though the full chef’s garb could perhaps have alerted them – if they had been looking), she brought out their desserts and stood by the table while the waiting staff took them from her tray and served. No fuss, no nonsense, no flamboyance, not even a word – just another of the waiting staff. There, in person, not pressing the flesh of important people, on a Friday lunchtime. Beat that. I infer that she isn’t, as other reviewers have snidely hinted, spending disproportionate amounts of time on celebrity.

Surprise item of the day: partridge breast tortellini with orange zest. Melting beef, as magnificent as in Autumn 2011. Lovely and unpretentiously served amuses-bouche … and the gratis charcuterie pre-starter tasted … of pig. (I don’t consider unwarmed bread to be a hanging offence: first, it was delicious unwarmed, second, it was served with rosemary bread sticks, which I don’t think anyone could reasonably expect to be warm, third, robust charcuterie and warm bread don’t go, and finally, we opted to keep our bread handy to mop up the last molecules of main-course sauce, by which time even 3* Michelin bread would probably be back to room temperature; but maybe Heston keeps an on-demand blowtorch handy.)

Just one tiny word of caution: we had anticipated ordering the £30 table d’hote menu, but it didn’t seem to be there. It was, of course: you just had to turn the page from the a la carte – which is the same, and the same price, as the dinner menu. But there are some things so entrancing you don’t feel inclined to turn the page, and that is one of them.

Final hint: talk to the staff. They have a great sense of humour, and chat intelligently, extremely knowledgably, and with a perfect degree of informality that elevates this restaurant above some of the more starchy institutions. But this is a serious place, and don’t expect them to indulge in friendly banter unless you initiate it; if you want full-on gratuitous and uninvited ego-greasing, try a GR outlet.
Comment on this reader review

David Levy
Overall rating 8 stars
Food 9 | Service 9 | Atmosphere 8 | Value for money 7
Saturday, March 17, 2012

Good competent Italian-inspired food, excellent service. The food didn't blow us away as much as we expected but it was tasty and had a few really standout pieces.

Angela Hartnett was in the kitchen and it was good to see her coming out occasionally to check things. A few people went in to the kitchen to look round - which was a nice touch to be allowed to do [if a little cheesy].

The prices are very reasonable for the food but of course any alcohol can easily double the bill so watch out!

Overall a good meal but not sure it was impressive enough for us to return. Just so many good places to eat in London we might as well keep trying different places.
Comment on this reader review

cut2qwik
Overall rating 9 stars
Food 8 | Service 9 | Atmosphere 8 | Value for money 9
Saturday, January 21, 2012

In December 2011, we went to Murano for my hubby's birthday. We went to Angela Harnett's restaurant when she was still at the Connaught but we had never been to Murano. We were looking forward to our meal as we enjoyed our meal at the Connaught when Angela Harnett was Head Chef there.

For dinner, the restaurant offers a Piemonte Tasting Menu at £85 or A la Carte. For the menu a la Carte, we had the choice of having 3 courses for £65 or 4 courses for £75, and they left the choice of the courses entirely to us as they are very flexible. We chose to go for the 4 courses A La Carte as my hubby didn't fancy what was on the Piemonte Tasting Menu and it was his birthday afterall!

We chose a starter, a fish course, a meat course and a dessert. Both of us chose different dishes so we had a good idea by the end of our meal about the kind of food they served.

As Amuse Bouche, they brought us some kind of deep fried croquettes which were very nice. Then they brought us some charcuterie presented on a little board with a basket of bread. The charcuterie was very nice. The bread was OK. One thing I would say is that for restaurants of this standard, generally we expect them to give us some warm bread (as if they were baking just for us) but it wasn't the case.

Still the Amuse Bouche followed by the Charcuterie and the bread were a nice surprise and we were looking forward to the rest of our dinner.

For starter, my hubby ordered Pumpkin, Tortelli, sage butter, crushed amaretti - the Tortelli was itself adequate but the whole dish in itself was very dry.

The starter I chose was Scallops Castelfiorito lentils, apple, fennel, Pata Negra - this was a disappointing dish. I was wondering why they decided to put a tiny bit of apple fennel salad and very tiny piece of Pata Negra on the top of the scallops as it didn't go together. It didn't bring anything to the dish and OMG the tiny piece of Pata Negra wasn't even of the best quality!!!

For the fish course, my hubby ordered Monkfish Braised, baby leeks, cuttlefish "risotto", salsify - The monkfish itself was good but rather on the small side. This dish overall was OK but not more.

My fish course consisted of Halibut Bread purée, pear compote, white onion fondue, scallop velouté - The Halibut was good but the bread puree, the pear compote and the white onion fondue didn't really work altogether! There was too much on the plate and it gets too confusing for the palate.

For the meat course, my hubby ordered Venison Grilled foie gras, parsnip, pancetta, pearl barley - this dish was much better than my meat course but in terms of originality, there wasn't anything to write home about.

My meat course consisted of Partridge Jerusalem artichoke, wild mushrooms, walnuts - this dish was extremely disappointing as the Partridge was very dry. In fact, a few days before we went to Magdalen and my hubby ordered Partridge which was much better cooked than at Murano. The Partridge at Magdalen was moist and juicy unlike at Murano.

For dessert, we ordered two different desserts to share between us:

A Soufflé Caramel, fresh mint chantilly - this was probably the best dish of the evening as it was enjoyable but having said that it was not the best soufflé I ever had!

A Buttermilk Pannacotta, sorrel granité, hazelnut mousse - This dessert was very weird, it was like having three desserts on the same plate! We didn't quite know why they decided to put these three components on the same plate as they didn't go with each other! It reminded us of Masterchef, we were wondering what Michel Roux, Greg Wallace or the food critics would think about this combination!!

When I booked a table for this occasion, I mentioned to them that it was to celebrate my husband's birthday. Just to show that they know about my husband's birthday, when they served the dessert they just wrote in chocolate on the plate: Happy Birthday. I thought that was very cheap, they may just as well not bothered! At other restaurants of this standard, they generally give us an extra dessert to celebrate the occasion.

Another bad point that I would like to mention was the fact that one of my dishes was served on a chipped plate (actually the plate was chipped at two places even!). A Michelin star restaurant serving food on a chipped plate???? I was wondering what a Michelin inspector would think about that!

The service was nice, efficient and friendly...but sorry this is not enough to make us come back as the food was ordinary and so unmemorable! The dinner was rather expensive for a meal of such ordinary quality. The bill came to around £240 for the two of us including half a bottle of red wine (and we had tap water). Not cheap for ordinary Italian food or even sub-standard food!

My husband thought that the wine list was on the expensive side comparing with other Michelin star restaurants. The mark up on wine was enormous.

Needless to say, our dinner at Murano was very disappointing. Maybe Angela Hartnett is too busy writing books and appearing on TV programmes etc... and doesn't have the time to keep an eye on the standard of food served at her restaurant???
Comment on this reader review

Kim
Overall rating 5 stars
Food 4 | Service 8 | Atmosphere 7 | Value for money 2
Thursday, January 19, 2012

I love this restaurant. This was our second visit, and a second taster menu, and we weren't disappointed. We gave up all pretence of responsibility, and took wine recommendations on every course from the enthusiastic and knowledgeable sommelier. Absolutely delicious all round - too many highlights to mention all, but the lamb and the pumpkin parfait were particularly extraordinarly. Expensive but worth every penny.
Comment on this reader review

Michelle
Overall rating 10 stars
Food 10 | Service 10 | Atmosphere 10 | Value for money 10
Saturday, November 05, 2011

Weird how the reviews lurch between 2 star bitter -- really bitter -- disappointments and unreserved wow. It suggests that we all come to an event like fine dining with our own expectations and preconceptions. Variations in service and food can't -- surely -- be that great. On the basis of the reviews, amateur and otherwise, I wouldn't have bothered -- but that would have been a terrible mistake. First: Angela herself was there, on an ordinary Thursday evening. She happened to be at the reception desk as we were leaving and we had a couple of minutes of amusing chat: utterly unpretentious. Second: Yotam Ottolenghi happened to be at the next table with three friends. Nobody else recognised him, and the city boys nearby didn't look up from their plates (average clearing time about 4 minutes) or their Chateuneuf (disappearance time rather similar). I don't think Ottolenghi would dine at a disappointing venue; apart from a brief visit to the table from Angela (again unnoticed by the city boys) and an offer of a complimentary glass of champagne, I don't think the red carpet was specially rolled out for him -- nor would there be any need.

The place was jammed by 8-30. Funny how I never seem to get to one of these places to find it half empty. Must be my galvanic personality.

Lovely, friendly staff, genuinely smiley; but perhaps I missed the bitter, twisted, casual and uncaring undertones that others have apparently detected.

Food breathtaking, and almost brought me to tears of pleasure. I've never lingered over dishes so long (though Le Gavroche has run it a close second). Artichoke risotto barely of this world, likewise pumpkin tortelli, and I'm not sure what elysian field the beef was reared in (the combination of flavours assembled round it was startling -- water cress puree, bone marrow, tiny capers and a caramelised onion jam). Just the merest pause for thought over the Tonka bean souffle and balsamic vinegar macaroons, though I was smitten. And what's this carping about portion size? Nando's this ain't. Glorious fluorescent green olives with the aperitif; bread, herb bread sticks and charcuterie with a very special Sicilian olive oil to start; two amuses bouche (including a wonderful refined mini rice pudding); a slice of fabulous sicilian lemon tart thrown in for my birthday; and exquisite liquid chocolate truffles with coffee (which we couldn't finish because we were full).

£65 for three courses at an establishment like this doesn't strike me as murderously expensive. We had a very modest amount of wine, so it came out at just over £200 for two. To be repeated with variations every 6 months, just to reassure myself that there are wonderful things in this world, and of course to do the official experiment to catch out the place on one of its apparently many off nights..

Food too refined, not refined enough; service servile, service uncaring; decor too 50s, too 80s, too 90s; lighting too harsh, not enough to read the menu. Nothing can be to our perfect individual liking. But in a world full of humans, this comes pretty damn close for my money.
Comment on this reader review

David Levy
Overall rating 9 stars
Food 10 | Service 9 | Atmosphere 9 | Value for money 8
Friday, October 14, 2011

I liked this restaurant - and not my normal kind of thing. Good value lunch and really nice staff.
Comment on this reader review

eat my sauce - View all reviews by this user
Overall rating 8 stars
Food 8 | Service 8 | Atmosphere 8 | Value for money 8
Thursday, September 01, 2011

Our meal at the Murano was the finest dining experience we had ever had. The food was utterly sensational. The enjoyment set the mood for the whole day and has been a great inspiration to seek great food and fantastic combinations of flavours & ingredients ever since. The friendliness and warmth of the highly attentative staff further enhanced our enjoyment as they guided us through the menu beautifully.

The crab salad blended wonderful flavours and above all exuded the perfect taste of crab. My red mullet was not only a feast to the eye but was done to the point of perfection, the tempura vegetable accompaniment was crisp and the finest I have ever had. The monkfish and beef main dishes were both incredible: both had a combination of flavours that complimented each perfectly and were a delight to eat. The chocolate dessert was a sensation we will not quickly forget. Indeed, the whole meal was a joy and a celebration & showcase for great talent. So very highly recommended.
Comment on this reader review

CP Wong
Overall rating 10 stars
Food 10 | Service 10 | Atmosphere 9 | Value for money 9
Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Good food presented well but not the best we've had. This restaurant is unfortunately let down by the staff - we found them to be very indifferent to us and they were certainly not very friendly, in fact the sommelier (who is supposedly world-renowned) was actually downright rude.

Having paid upwards of £350 for 2 of us we expected a really special experience but left feeling cheated and certainly won't be going back.
Comment on this reader review

P McGann
Overall rating 5 stars
Food 8 | Service 2 | Atmosphere 4 | Value for money 4
Sunday, July 24, 2011

I was sadly really quite disappointed in Murano. When you go to a formal restaurant and spend nigh on 500 quid for two you expect to be blown away by highly skilled dishes that you wouldn't even be able to contemplate making at home. At Murano there is a dichotomy in being served immensely plain Italian food in tiny portions whilst sitting in a formal, hushed dining room filled with international businessmen, and it rendered the whole experience rather unconvincing. Locanda Locatelli and the River Cafe are both leagues ahead in serving vibrant Italian food that does not jar with the setting.

If you took any of the dishes I had at Murano and re-plated them informally using twice the amount, then served them in a buzzy, bistro style location at half the price, I would have been singing its praises. As it stands, the sense of warmth, conviviality and generosity you associate with Italian food is totally lacking here, yet simultaneously there is no wonderment in the level of cooking skill one would expect from a restaurant with obvious michellin aspirations and the solemn, almost reverential atmosphere that typically accompanies them.
Comment on this reader review

Murray
Overall rating 3 stars
Food 4 | Service 5 | Atmosphere 2 | Value for money 2
Saturday, July 16, 2011


what the bloggers say

A Rather Unusual Chinaman

A Rather Unusual Chinaman

Wednesday, December 29, 2010 - My main of venison with parsnip and winter veg, was in a nutshell, pretty damn sexy. The tender slices of loin were cooked perfectly, with a caramelised nugget of meat on the side, absolutely bursting with flavour, and the veg was, well, veg. But very well cooked veg at that...So in summation, I had a pretty damn enjoyable time. Everything we had eaten was expertly cooked, and care and consideration had been taken when considering balancing flavours and textures without being overly complicated. The service was perfect, without being too obtrusive.

London Eater

London Eater

Tuesday, November 09, 2010 - Don't chastise me for this, and it does pain me to have to write this, but I didn't like Murano. There are shades of glory, but I think it misses the boat on the crucial parts of the meal, more glitz than substance, and toward the lower end of the one starred spectrum. You couldn't fault the cooking, it was superb of course, and service was generally top notch but gosh those recipes, they seemed tried and tired. I loved York & Albany, and I read all the reviews, and I tried to like the meal, but there was no wow factor, in complete contrast to Y&A, I think the problem with this meal was that it felt anonymous to me.

A Girl Has To Eat

A Girl Has To Eat - 9/10

Tuesday, March 03, 2009 - I say the food impressed. Yes it did, for where the dishes were good, they were remarkably good as to present to us an incredibly masterful hand…Taken in its totality, the food was Michelin worthy. Furthermore, there was no denying the superiority of the ingredients or the wonderful little added extras that rounded off our meal.

+ Show more bloggers
You may also like these restaurants:
quick search
user tools
latest blog entry

Special Offers

Great Deals At Top London Restaurants From toptable.co.uk
london tweeting

Barrio Bars to open a new site in Shoreditch next month (via Caterer) - http://t.co/DmDQwfUl

save this page
best for...
cuisine
our sites
city eating